Cases 1 - 10 of 1,500
United States v. Terry Campie
as 24-1901
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terry Marshall Campie
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reggie Huff v. Brookings Police Department, et al
as 24-1776
Plaintiff:
Reggie D. Huff
Defendant:
Brookings Police Department, Dawn M. Elshere, Nominal Defendant, David Erickson and others
Greg Hale, et al v. ARcare, Inc
as 24-1726
Plaintiff:
Greg Hale, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Melissa Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Alicia Gilmore, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant:
ARcare, Inc, originally named as ARcare
Bobbitt v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mason Bobbitt
Defendant:
US Marshals, USA and PCRDF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kimery v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Fields v. Federal U.S. Marshalls
as 4:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Keyanna Fields
Defendant:
Federal U.S. Marshalls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
United States v. Anthony Marshall
as 24-1518
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Byron Marshall
Marshall Lee v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Darlene Marshall Lee
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
