Cases 1 - 10 of 30
James et al v. Administration for Children Services
as 1:2022cv06750
Plaintiff:
Vanessa James, Marvin James and Amber James
Defendant:
Administration for Children Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Womack et al v. Louisiana CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2021cv00134
Defendant:
Daniel G. Kamin Baton Rouge-Airline Highway Corporation, Marvin James Finley, DEF Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Womack and John Womack
Debtor:
Daniel G Kamin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Omni Hotel Management Corp et al
as 3:2020cv00428
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Commerce and Omni Hotel Management Corp
Plaintiff:
Marvin James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv38110
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEEKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00258
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JAMES MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv55852
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOKES JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33809
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JAMES STOKES JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhine v. USA
as 1:2019cv00177
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marvin James Rhine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00609
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra
USA v. Marvin Rhine
as 18-40330
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARVIN JAMES RHINE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
