Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Randall v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv01826
Petitioner:
Marvin Randall
Respondent:
Oregon and Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson et al v. McDowell County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv00246
Plaintiff:
Martin Ray Robinson, James Julius Lumpkin, David Kenneth Fowler and others
Defendant:
McDowell County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc.
as 0:2014cv62285
Plaintiff:
Marvin Randall
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc.
Mediator:
John S. Freud
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Randall v. Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc.
as FLS/0:14-cv-60233
Plaintiff:
Marvin Randall
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc.
Randall v. Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc.
as 0:2014cv60233
Plaintiff:
Marvin Randall
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Randall v. National Credit Systems Incorporated
as 2:2013cv00616
Plaintiff:
Marvin Randall
Defendant:
National Credit Systems Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Randall v. Progressive Financial Services Incorporated
as 2:2012cv02468
Plaintiff:
Marvin Randall
Defendant:
Progressive Financial Services Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. State of Alaska, Office of Children Services et al
as 3:2012cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jed Smith
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Office of Children Services, Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation , Alaska Cares and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RANDALL v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60061
Plaintiff:
MARVIN RANDALL
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
