Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alma Glisson v. Indiana Department of Correcti, et al
as 15-1419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALMA GLISSON, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Nicholas Glisson
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, MALAKA G. HERMINA, Doctor and others
Combs v. EFP, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00686
Plaintiff:
Anna Marie Combs
Defendant:
EFP, Inc. and EFP Catalina LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Combs et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv08889
Plaintiff:
Sheila Marie Combs and Kevin Eugene Combs
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GLISSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2012cv01418
Defendant:
MARY COMBS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., MALAKA G. HERMINA and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS GLISSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Combs v. Actavis Totowa, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00643
Plaintiff:
Vickie Marie Combs and Bennie Allen Combs
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Inc., Actavis Elizabeth, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Agnew et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01687
Plaintiff:
Hattie Agnew, Hattie Agnew, Hattie Agnew and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia Corporation and G.D. Searle LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dearmore, et al v. City of Garland
as 06-11007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROY DEARMORE, Individually and as Representative of all Owners of Single Family Residential Property in Garland Texas, A C BLAIR, Individually and as Representative of all Property Managers in Garland, Texas and MARIE COMBS, Individually and as Representative of all Tenants of Single Family Residential Property in Garland, TX
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF GARLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
