Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hall-Rayford et al v. Owens et al
as 2:2022cv12714
Plaintiff:
Mary Hall-Rayford, Karen Beltz, Karen Mouradjian and others
Defendant:
Monique Owens and Eastpointe, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Asher et al v. Clay County Board of Education et al
as 6:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Clay County Board of Education, CCBOE, Mark Hoskins and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Asher, Shawn Smith, Carol Jean Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Bally et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv01088
Defendant:
Mary Hall-Thiam, Jeannette Bradshaw, Jonathan Kinloch and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Hatch, Steven Butler, Lena Bally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams-Kiel et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11416
Plaintiff:
Lawanda Adams-Kiel , George Kiel , Lawrence Adolph and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv00363
Plaintiff:
Misty Marie Hall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hall v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01394
Plaintiff:
Anna Marie Hall
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Robin Keeton
as 13-8057
Debtor:
In re: ROBIN KEETON
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARY HALL SERGENT and NATASHA LEIGH GUSSLER KINNAN
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBIN KEETON
Hall v. Hall et al
as 3:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
David A. Hall
Defendant:
Deana Marie Hall and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Audrey Hall v. CIR
as 10-2628
Petitioner - Appellee:
AUDREY MARIE HALL
Respondent - Appellant:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
