Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Shapat Nabaya v. Mary Lauck
as 24-5048
Plaintiff:
Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya
Defendant:
Mary Hannah Lauck
NABAYA v. LAUCK
as 1:2023cv02650
Plaintiff:
SHAPAT NABAYA
Defendant:
MARY HANNAH LAUCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Feltner et al v. Dragonfly Entertainment Group LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03052
Plaintiff:
Jordan Feltner and Mary Hannah Williams
Counter Defendant:
Jessica Savage
Defendant:
Dragonfly Entertainment Group LLC, Jody Bouffard and Dragonfly Entertainment Group LLC doing business as Blush & Blu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Currence v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2020cv00376
Respondent:
Judge Mary Hannah Lauck and United States District Court
Petitioner:
Kareem Jamal Currence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BOWDLER v. LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING et al
as 2:2018cv00627
Plaintiff:
NICOLE MARIE BOWDLER
Defendant:
LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, M&T BANK, KML LAW GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Carter v. Koskinen et al
as 8:2016cv02969
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thomas Carter
Defendant:
John Koskinen, Carolyn W. Colvin, Sheryl Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gunter-El v. Lew et al
as 1:2015cv00729
Plaintiff:
DeBorah Gunter-El
Defendant:
Jacob J. Lew, Robert E. McKenzie, Stanley J. Milesky and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Rott v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, et al
as 14-6152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. ROTT
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, JAY HARRINGTON and others
William Bullock v. IRS
as 14-2911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM C. BULLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, HENRY SLAUGHTER, DEANN BENDER and others
Rott v. Oklahoma Tax Commission et al
as 5:2013cv01041
Plaintiff:
John E Rott
Defendant:
Oklahoma Tax Commission , Oklahoma State of , Jay L Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
