Cases 11 - 20 of 41
JORDAN v. MATCO TOOLS CORPORATION
as 1:2021cv00490
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JORDAN
Defendant:
MATCO TOOLS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Bohannon et al v. Matco Tools Corporation et al
as 6:2020cv01178
Defendant:
Q.E.P. Co., Inc. and Matco Tools Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jake Bohannon and Shannon Chrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00957
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Harris v. Matco Tools Corporation
as 6:2019cv01464
Defendant:
Matco Tools Corporation
Plaintiff:
Drew Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aguilera et al v. Matco Tools Corporation
as 3:2019cv01576
Plaintiff:
Rocio Aguilera, Emanuel Aguilera and Simon Goro
Defendant:
Matco Tools Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00534
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Matco Tools Corporation, et al v. USDC-CASF
as 19-71352
Petitioner:
FORTIVE CORPORATION, MATCO TOOLS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and NMTC, INC., a Delaware corporation, DBA Matco Tools
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MATCO TOOLS CORPORATION and NMTC, INC., DBA Matco Tools
Not Yet Classified:
JOHN FLEMING, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Matco Tools Corporation v. DeCasien et al
as 5:2019cv01027
Defendant:
Jeramin Holbert, Mark DeCasien and Anthony Bevacqua
Plaintiff:
Matco Tools Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matco Tools Corporation v. Urquhart
as 5:2019cv01009
Defendant:
Cary G Urquhart
Plaintiff:
Matco Tools Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
