Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Andrew Anderson v. State of North Carolina
as 24-1277
Plaintiff:
ANDREW D. ANDERSON, an individual, an American, and Disabled Veteran of Sylva, NC; We the People; All similarly situated free Americans
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROY A. COOPER, III, an individual, and Governor of North Carolina and others
Anderson v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Anderson
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, The Office of the Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matheson v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Matheson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lewallen v. Mitchell et al
as 9:2020cv03817
Defendant:
Nurse Kathryn, Lt Ham, Anderson County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edward Lewallen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindau Chemicals Inc v. Matheson Tri-Gas Inc
as 3:2018cv00706
Plaintiff:
Lindau Chemicals Inc
Defendant:
Matheson Tri-Gas Inc
Counter_claimant:
Matheson Tri-Gas Inc
Counter_defendant:
Lindau Chemicals Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matheson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02787
Plaintiff:
Laura Matheson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moses et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv32974
Plaintiff:
Megan Moses , Michelle Dishon , Janet Hedges and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson Works, Inc. v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Wilson Works, Inc.
Defendant:
Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matheson v. Matheson et al
as 8:2008cv02506
Plaintiff:
Charles B Matheson and Susan Matheson
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg-Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
