Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Mathis v. U S America
as 3:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Bernard Mathis
Respondent:
U S America and MDOC Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AVERY v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2023cv04375
Petitioner:
MATHIS AVERY, SR.
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathis v. Warden HDSP et al
as 2:2023cv00980
Petitioner:
Dontae Mathis
Respondent:
Warden HDSP and State of Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathis v. Lumpkin
as 23-40232
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jimmy Lee Mathis
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mathis v. Rivello et al
as 3:2023cv00225
Petitioner:
Vaughn Mathis
Respondent:
John Rivello, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathis v. Hawkins
as 4:2022cv01276
Plaintiff:
Catherine C Mathis
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Tonya Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mathis v. Rose
as 7:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Jay Gregory Mathis
Respondent:
Gary Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mathis v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00101
Petitioner:
Jay Gregory Mathis
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maurice Mathis v. Chris Buesgen
as 22-2390
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAURICE M. MATHIS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRIS S. BUESGEN
Mathis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2022cv00225
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Mathis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
