Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Raggio v. Hattaway
as 26-50536
Defendant:
University Federal Credit Union, John-Matthew Barrett Hattaway and Kathleen Ann Hattaway
Plaintiff:
Raggio - 2204 Jesse Owens, L.L.C.
Barrett v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 4:2026cv00317
Plaintiff:
Matthew Barrett
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith, et al v. Sheriff's Office, et al
as 25-1076
Plaintiff:
NATHAN J SMITH and HOLLY M SMITH
Defendant:
SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NICOLE BRIGGS, KOPP and others
Smith, et al v. Sheriff's Office, et al
as 24-1490
Defendant:
TASK FORCES, both sherrifs and GJPD task forces, swat teams, BRAUHM, SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN J SMITH and HOLLY M SMITH
United States v. Matthew Robbins
as 22-2984
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Matthew Barrett Robbins
United States v. Matthew Robbins
as 21-3360
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Matthew Barrett Robbins
Raggio - 2204 Jesse Owens,LLC, et al v. John-Matthew Hattaway, et al
as 20-50693
Defendant / Appellee:
Kathleen Ann Hattaway, John-Matthew Barrett Hattaway and University Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raggio - 2204 Jesse Owens, L.L.C. and Stacey R. Hammer
Raggio - 2204 Jesse Owens, LLC et al v. Hattaway et al
as 1:2019cv00697
Defendant:
University Federal Credit Union, Kathleen Ann Hattaway and John-Matthew Barrett Hattaway
Plaintiff:
Stacey R. Hammer and Raggio - 2204 Jesse Owens, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Hartshorn et al
as 2:2018cv02317
Defendant:
Matthew Barrett, Patrick Hartshorn and Colin Osterbur
Plaintiff:
David Blake Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
