Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Thompson v. Third Judicial District Court et al
as 2:2026cv00373
Plaintiff:
Cindy L. Thompson
Defendant:
Third Judicial District Court, Anderson & Karrenberg, John T. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2026cv00082
Petitioner:
Dallin Brad Hawkins
Respondent:
State of Utah, Linda Jones, Thomas Lopresto and others
Interested Party:
Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bates v. Bliss
as 2:2023cv02571
Plaintiff:
Matthew Bates
Defendant:
Jennifer Bliss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
BATES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26523
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BATES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bates v. Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan
as 4:2021cv00742
Plaintiff:
Matthew Bates
Defendant:
Schlumberger Group Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Raymond Tate v. D. J. Harmon
as 21-6109
Defendant / Appellee:
J. WOODARD, Cook Foreman, S. W. WHITE, Property Officer, ROGER MULLINS, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND TATE
Amicus Curiae:
RIGHTS BEHIND BARS and RODERICK & SOLANGE MACARTHUR JUSTICE CENTER
Gaertner v. Sowell et al
as 4:2020cv01872
Defendant:
Sharron Williams, 2nd, Madison Hudson, Chase Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Gaertner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22556
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BATES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30837
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BATES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
