Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United States v. Matthew Brockway
as 24-1413
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Matthew Edward Brockway
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kurck v. Lonoke County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2023cv00011
Defendant:
Danielle Cobb, Lonoke County Sheriff Department, John Staley and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy D Kurck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gauger v. Shultee et al
as 3:2022cv03040
Plaintiff:
Matthew Edward Gauger
Defendant:
Nurse Debora H Shultee, Sabastion Dennis, Sheriff John Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. McWilliams et al
as 4:2019cv01779
Defendant:
Gabriel C McWilliams, Jennifer R Frantz, Patricia McWilliams and others
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Kinney v. Allen et al
as 3:2017cv00337
Plaintiff:
Matthew Edward Kinney
Defendant:
Mike Allen , Mandy Johnson and Ronnie Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dan Lee, Sr. v. D. Matthew Edward
as 16-6020
Debtor:
In re: Dan Lee, Sr.
Debtor - Appellant:
Dan Lee, Sr.
Trustee - Appellee:
D. Matthew Edwards
Brockway v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv03075
Petitioner:
Matthew Edward Brockway
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Guilford v. USA
as 2:2016cv04168
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Matthew Edward Guilford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ahmed Shqeirat, et al v. Michael N. Cannizzaro
as 09-3201
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ahmed Shqeirat, Mohamed Ibrahim, Didmar Faja and others
Defendant:
U.S. Airways Group, Inc., U.S. Airways, Inc., Metropolitan Airports Commission and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael N. Cannizzaro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
