Cases 31 - 40 of 53
(PC) Bradford v. Attorney General of California et al
as 2:2018cv03249
Defendant:
Matthew Ross Wilson, Thomas P. Feher, Attorney General of California and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Mississippi Bar v. Ross
as 3:2018ad00005
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Matthew Ross
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Robert Ross v. Commissioner of Social Sec.
as 18-12083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MATTHEW ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Richard Donastorg v. City of Ontario et al
as 5:2018cv00992
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Brennan Falconieri, William Mlodzinski and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Donastorg
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Arthur K Cunningham and Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Lake Norman Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv06332
Defendant:
Lake Norman Enterprises, LLC and Nicholas Minerva
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ross
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Ross v. Lake Norman Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv06332
Defendant:
Lake Norman Enterprises, LLC and Nicholas Minerva
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ross
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Francis v. Dillon
as 17-1773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor Francis
Defendant - Appellee:
D.A. Denis E. Dillon, A.D.A. Sheryl Anania, P.O. Richard Parez and others
Francis v. Dillon et al
as 1:2017cv02473
Defendant:
ADA Sheryl Anania, P.O. Kevin Cotter, D.A. Dennis Dillon and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2016cv03203
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthew Ross
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ross v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 5:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ross
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
