Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Bartholomew v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Taylor Bartholomew and Adamas Hyahking Bartholomew-Bey
Defendant:
Matthew Smith, Dennis Wertz, Josh Kein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Feeney et al
as 1:2022cv01256
Petitioner:
Joseph L Harris
Respondent:
Charles Feeney, Matthew Smith, Dennis Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Clare County Municipal Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv10491
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthew Smith
Defendant:
Clare County Municipal Corporation, Genesee County Municipal Corporation, Major and others
Michael et al v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Muskegon, County of, Michael Poulin and others
Plaintiff:
Gracie Michael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Veenstra, et al. v. Little, et al.
as 1:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Kent Ellis, Charles Lynn Sacolick and others
Defendant:
Brad Little, Idaho State Board of Correction Members, Director IDOC Josh Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Lumpkin et al
as 3:2021cv00205
Petitioner:
Matthew Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, TX. Board of Pardons & Paroles Div., Huntsville Parole Board Members and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Holloway et al
as 5:2019cv05209
Defendant:
Sheriff Shawn Holloway and Deputy Cobb
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv00661
Plaintiff:
Steven Paul Parker Smith
Defendant:
Benjamin Wilkey, Jhonson and Matthew Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ruiz et al
as 1:2018cv05723
Defendant:
Officer Lenoir, Sgt. Gotay and Officer Ruiz
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Studley
as 4:2018cv00589
Defendant:
Tamara Studley
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
