Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Bohanon et al v. Riverside Resort and Casino Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv08068
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohanon and Stephanie Dobner
Defendant:
Riverside Resort and Casino Incorporated, Riverside Resort and Casino LLC, Matthew C Laughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Matthews v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv21188
Defendant:
CATINA MATTHEWS and Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Seybold v. V. Cruises US, LLC
as 1:2024cv21077
Plaintiff:
Matthew Arland Seybold
Defendant:
V. Cruises US, LLC doing business as Virgin Voyages
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Bancroft v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2023cv24294
Plaintiff:
Matthew Bancroft
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
In the Matter of Guice Offshore, LLC
as 3:2023cv00741
In Re:
Guice Offshore LLC
Claimant:
Anthony Johnson and Talos Energy LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Michael Matthew Jett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
HARKINS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HARKINS, CARRIE LEE GAGNON, SHANE NOLAN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Matthews v. Tidewater
as 23-30305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marek Matthews
Defendant / Appellee:
Tidewater, Incorporated and Tidewater Crewing, Limited
Lindsay v. North Atlantic Treaty Organization
as 2:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lindsay
Defendant:
North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ALBRECHT v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD.
as 1:2023cv20460
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW R. ALBRECHT
Defendant:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD. doing business as Royal Caribbean International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Papania v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Matthew Papania
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
