Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Joe Cabello v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 11-16620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE CABELLO, an individual person
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX, PHIL GORDON, Mayor, in his individual, official and personal capacities, jointly and severally, THELDA WILLIAMS, Councilwoman District One, in her individual, official and personal capacities, jointly and severally and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Salman et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2011cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael H Salman and Suzanne Salman
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of , Claude Mattox , Unknown Mattox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strozier v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2011cv00708
Plaintiff:
Myron Strozier
Defendant:
Cobb County, David Darden, Tiffany Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hawks v. Mattox, et al
as 09-2316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN L. HAWKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM MATTOX, DAN MORALES, JOHN CORNYN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-3836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joe Cabello v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 09-16217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE CABELLO, an individual person
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX, PHIL GORDON, Mayor, in his individual, official and personal capacities, jointly and severally, THELDA WILLIAMS, Councilwoman District One, in her individual, official and personal capacities, jointly and severally and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
