Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Arnold et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Arnold, John Matthew Abboud, Frank T Abel and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Arnold et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Arnold, John Matthew Abboud, Frank T Abel and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05070
Plaintiff:
Maurice Bailey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bailey v. United States of America, The
as 2:2021cv02550
Plaintiff:
Maurice Bailey
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
H. v. WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv03396
Plaintiff:
B. H.
Defendant:
WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION, WYNDHAM HOTEL GROUP, LLC, WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
H. v. ROOSEVELT INN, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv03225
Plaintiff:
B. H.
Defendant:
ROOSEVELT INN, LLC, ROOSEVELT MOTOR INN, INC., UFVS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
ANTHONY BROOKS and MAURICE BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
BAILEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00179
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BAILEY
Defendant:
MARC COPOZZA, ALBERT WOOD and JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice Bailey v. Warden
as 20-7090
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAURICE BAILEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN
Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05543
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Maurice Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Bailey v. Warden
as 7:2020cv00284
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Maurice Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
