Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Tipton v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al.
as 1:2026cv01542
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Tipton
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, University Hospital of Elyria Medical Center, University Hospital of Cleveland Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rahman
as 26-1776
Plaintiff:
LYDIA DIANE JONES
Defendant:
JAHIDUR RAHMAN, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., CATHERIN B. DEMPSEY and others
Hamann v. Scott et al
as 1:2026cv06935
Plaintiff:
Paul Hamann
Defendant:
Doug P Scott, Michael T Carrigan, Ann McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Galina Novakhova v. Anjelique Bonilla, et al
as 26-2463
Plaintiff:
GALINA M. NOVAKHOVA
Defendant:
ANJELIQUE J. BONILLA, ALLA IZRAILOVA, JOSE ANWAR TRIPP and others
Germaine Harris v. Ron DeSantis, et al
as 26-12047
Plaintiff:
GERMAINE D. HARRIS
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, BERNIE MCCABE and others
Paul Yalnezian v. Brian McCabe et al
as 2:2026cv05472
Plaintiff:
Paul Yalnezian
Defendant:
Hon Brian McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC)Holman v. McCabe et al
as 2:2026cv01829
Plaintiff:
Jasman Dawone Holman
Defendant:
Gabriel McCabe, Brandsqfway Services LLC and The Law Offices of Jacob Emrani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kotevski v. Du et al
as 1:2026cv02146
Defendant:
Lilly Winschester, Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani, Miranda Du and others
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darryl Fuller v. Wayne McCabe
as 26-6593
Petitioner:
DARRYL A. FULLER
Respondent:
WAYNE MCCABE, Warden
Roush et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04302
Plaintiff:
Brenda M. Roush, Dakota McCabe, John Psiharis and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
