Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Wright v. Teodeosio, et al
as 5:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Michelle Wright
Defendant:
Judge Linda Tucci Teodosio, Suzi Shae, Shushila Moor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
James Wright v. Debra Sauers, et al
as 17-3152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES OSCAR WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, MICHAEL OVERMYER, ERIC TICE and others
Lorenzo Sims v. Wexford Health Sources Inc, et al
as 15-2739
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO SIMS
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC, CORIZON INC, DR. NANCY MCGARVIE, Medical Director and others
COLEMAN v. MCGARVIE et al
as 1:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
DREW COLEMAN
Defendant:
NANCIE R. FLYNN MCGARVIE and BEVERLY SUMMERS OROURKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrieta v. Lemke et al
as 1:2015cv02576
Plaintiff:
Joseph Arrieta
Defendant:
Michael Lemke, Tejeda, J. Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COGGINS et al v. KEYSTONE FOODS, LLC
as 2:2015cv00480
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. COGGINS , JOHN A. VANTINE , DONALD P. MCGARVIE and others
Defendant:
KEYSTONE FOODS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 1:2014cv00108
Plaintiff:
LORENZO SIMS
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, CORIZON INC., NANCY FLYNN MCGARVIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, ERIC TICE, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. WEXFORD CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
VINCENT M. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
WEXFORD CORP., MCGARVIE, FERDANKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Wexford Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00527
Plaintiff:
Vincent Maxwell Campbell
Defendant:
Wexford Corporation, McGarvie, Ferdarko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
