Cases 11 - 20 of 140
DAVIS v. DOE et al
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 1-9, LINDA ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKAY v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv01091
Petitioner:
OMALI MCKAY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ERIC ARMEL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark McKay v. Gibbons, et al
as 22-1302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK MCKAY
Defendant / Appellee:
TED KRIMMEL, BRIAN HESSENTHALER, CHRISTOPHER GRAYO and others
GREEN, JR. et al v. SANFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
ANDY GREEN, JR., TINA CULCLAGER, TANGIE SIMS and others
Defendant:
SANFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC., PATHEON MANUFACTURING SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burke and Rutecki, LLC v. The City of Lewes et al
as 1:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
Burke and Rutecki, LLC
Defendant:
The City of Lewes, The Mayor and City Council of the City of Lewes, The City of Lewes Planning Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKay v. Harry et al
as 4:2021cv01053
Defendant:
Superintendent Harry and John Wetzel
Plaintiff:
Mark McKay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON et al v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv12158
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MCKAY, PATRICIA JOHNSON and DEANNA JOHNSON
Defendant:
ALL AMERICAN RESTORATION CORPORATION, NKL MECANICAL, CERTIFIED MOLD INSPECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HILL v. SCHWARTZ et al
as 2:2021cv00659
Defendant:
MS WARDEN BRYAN L. KLINE, LIEUTENANT BRAD TOMASELLO, COUNSELOR CORY SNYDER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DEAN v. J. BISSELL et al
as 2:2021cv09770
Defendant:
BELL JR., TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE, JOZSA and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
