Cases 11 - 20 of 165
Demetrios McNeill v. Warden R. Ramos
as 23-6488
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEMETRIOS DONELL MCNEILL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN R. RAMOS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Reaves v. Schwedo et al
as 4:2023cv01911
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Kevin Schwedo, Thomas Scott Wilkerson, Robert "Rob" Bailes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Toby McDuffie, Jr. v. Wade
as 23-6411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOBY M. MCDUFFIE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. WADE, CHENEQUA MCNEILL and CAPTAIN THOMPSON
James McNeill v. Monica Bond
as 23-6181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MONICA BOND
Defendant:
CAMERON GADDY, NICOLAS BUSTILLOS, VIGO and others
Gann v. Victoria County Sheriff's Office
as 6:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Wayne Bernard Gann
Defendant:
Victoria County Sheriff's Office, Captain Charles Williamson, Dr. McNeill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNEILL v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2022cv01044
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LAVON MCNEILL
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCOY v. MCNEILL et al
as 5:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SYLVESTER MCCOY, JR
Defendant:
RAYMOND MCNEILL, KRISTAIN SHAW, JOSHUA GWYN SEIGLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emilien v. McNeill et al
as 6:2022cv03326
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Emilien
Defendant:
Chelsea B. McNeill and Matthew R. Ozment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
MCNEILL v. USA
as 1:2022cv00642
Petitioner:
EDDIE LAVON MCNEILL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McNeill v. Ramos et al
as 5:2022hc02134
Petitioner:
Demetrios Donell McNeill
Respondent:
Warden R. Ramos and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
