Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MURCHISON v MEDIKO, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
MALIK H. MURCHISON
Defendant:
MEDIKO, INC. doing business as MEDIKO CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, HOWARD CARLTON, BSN RN, COLONEL DEREK T. ALMARODE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Eckard v. Rhodes et al
as 0:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Seth Eckard, Jr.
Defendant:
Marcus Rhodes, Phillip Thompson, Officer Sapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Bailey v. Mediko, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Randolph Bailey
Defendant:
Mediko, Inc. and Virat Bakhshi, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Kazimierczak v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2022cv03579
Plaintiff:
Cameron Kazimierczak
Defendant:
Marcus Rhodes, Phillip Thompson, J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Jones v. Mediko Inc et al
as 5:2022cv02387
Plaintiff:
Antonio L Jones
Defendant:
Mediko Inc, Phillip Thompson, Marcus Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dontell v. Rhodes et al
as 9:2022cv01641
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Dontell
Defendant:
Marcus Rhodes, Sheriff Phillip Thompson, Captain Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hicks v. Mediko, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Marcus Terrell Hicks
Defendant:
Mediko, Inc., Nurse Stacy Brooks, Patrick Simms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Mediko, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Caesare Cunningham
Defendant:
Mediko, Inc., Virat Bakhshi, Linda Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cecil v. Hulbert et al
as 7:2021cv00279
Defendant:
Dr. Charles Hulbert and Mediko, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
