Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Medlin v. Flottman et al
as 6:2026cv03587
Plaintiff:
Haven Medlin
Defendant:
Ellen H Flottman and Mary Sheffield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Lexington County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2026cv04001
Plaintiff:
Kearie Burton
Defendant:
Lexington County Sheriff's Office and Deputy Michael L. Medlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medlin v. Ipock et al
as 6:2026cv03538
Plaintiff:
Haven Medlin
Defendant:
Fnu Ipock, Jane Doe, Fnu Hance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-20476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cardoza v. Mott et al
as 8:2026cv03304
Plaintiff:
GARY CARDOZA
Defendant:
DEAN MOTT and Medline Industries, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Hergert v Medlin
as 3:2026cv02568
Unknown:
Lonny Eugene Hergert and Billy Royce Medlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Medlin v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2026cv08867
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan S. Medlin
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fredbeck et al v. Medline Industries, LP et al
as 1:2026cv08375
Plaintiff:
Jon C. Fredbeck and Colt R. Nelms
Defendant:
Medline Industries, LP, Board of Directors of Medline Industries, LP, Medline Industries, LP Qualified Plans Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Piazza et al v. Medline Industries LP et al
as 3:2026cv01028
Plaintiff:
Michael Piazza and Maria Piazza
Defendant:
Medline Industries LP, Community Surgical Supply, AdaptHealth Patient Care Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
