Cases 1 - 10 of 1,091
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv03777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ORTIZ v. PINCKNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MEDRANO ORTIZ
Defendant:
SHATEEMA PINCKNEY, TAMEKA SMITH, REGINA HAMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medrano v. Paragon Professional Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Medrano
Defendant:
Paragon Professional Services, LLC and Asset Protection and Security Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Medrano Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-3022
Petitioner:
JHUSTHYN KUEL MEDRANO HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Medrano Robayo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2993
Petitioner:
JOHN HERMES MEDRANO ROBAYO, YUDY CAROLINA HERNANDEZ PARRA, DAN JEREMY MEDRANO HERNANDEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Westfield Insurance Company v. Bozza et al
as 1:2024cv03596
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gary Bozza and Jose Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Escamilla v. Judge Medrano
as 3:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Jorge Melenudo Escamilla
Respondent:
Judge Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guy v. City of Corpus Christi et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Walter Kevin Guy
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Julianna Siracusa Rivera, Matthew Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elvis Medrano v. Brandon Garland, et al
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
ELVIS C. MEDRANO
Defendant:
BRANDON GARLAND, KANE WAGGONER, GREG DIETCH and others
Biel et al v. Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv02979
Plaintiff:
Miguel F. Biel and Doris Divina Medrano
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC, Walmart, Inc. and Kofi S. Agbotse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
