Cases 11 - 20 of 6,084
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Arvidsson v. Malek et al
as 1:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Megan G. Arvidsson
Defendant:
Susan M. Malek, EAN Holdings, LLC and ELRAC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Zelesnik v. DeWine et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Governor Mike DeWine, Joe Citero, John Rice and others
Woodruff v. Abbott Laboratories Inc.
as 1:2024cv03231
Plaintiff:
Megan Woodruff
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories Inc. doing business as Abbott Nutrition
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Powell et al v. Burke Dermatology S.C., et al
as 1:2024cv03265
Plaintiff:
Deborah Powell and Megan Mears
Defendant:
Burke Dermatology S.C.,, William Burke and Jennifer Burke
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Raney v. Goehl et al
as 2:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Adam Raney
Defendant:
Officer Goehl, Officer Wodak, Ashley Haseleu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adamowicz v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-1042
Plaintiff:
MELANIE WEISS, GENE ADAMOWICZ, MARY BEBBER and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Syposs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Megan Lynn Syposs
Defendant:
commissioner of social secuirty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Donald Higgs v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1712
Plaintiff:
DONALD D. HIGGS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN, Esq., NJ DOC Commissioner, M. CHERY, Corrections Officer and others
Megan Trama et al v. RELX PLC et al
as 2:2024cv03174
Plaintiff:
Megan Trama, Matthew Hartz, Rafael Robles and others
Defendant:
RELX PLC, RELX Group PLC, RELX Holdings Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
