Cases 71 - 80 of 3,860
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Douglas Menjivar Mejia, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1183
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS JAVIER MENJIVAR MEJIA, RUTH NOEMY RIVERA DE MENJIVAR, BRANDON STEVEN GAMEZ RIVERA and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brian Mejia Ontiveros v. San Bernardino County et al
as 5:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Brian Mejia Ontiveros
Defendant:
San Bernardino County, Eli Harrison and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mejia-De Marquez v. Garland
as 24-60045
Petitioner:
Paola Eunice Mejia-De Marquez and Edgardo Ezequiel Marquez-Mejia
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Mejia v. Brick And Stone Masons, LTD. et al
as 2:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Jose Mejia
Defendant:
Brick And Stone Masons, LTD. and Paul Ribeiro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Castro Villanueva et al v. M&Z Group, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Castro Villanueva and Margarito Mejia
Defendant:
M&Z Group, LLC doing business as Zuma by Chef Ninja, Felipe Sanchez and Glendi Contreras
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
USA v. Angel Mejia
as 24-1032
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGEL MEJIA
Mejia v. Viacord, LLC
as 0:2024cv60060
Plaintiff:
Valentina Mejia
Defendant:
Viacord, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
