Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dajade Melby v. Lt. Rigsby
as 24-6222
Plaintiff:
DAJADE MELBY
Defendant:
LT. RIGSBY and LT. JEAN-PIERRE
Melby v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00877
Plaintiff:
Dajade Melby
Defendant:
Unknown, Lt. Rigsby and Lt. Jean-Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacqueline Palmer et al v. Rob Bonta et al
as 5:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Palmer, Heather Lewis and Rodolfo Jaravata-Hanson
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, Kristina Lawson and Loretta Melby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Partridge v. State of Minnesota Beltrami County et al
as 0:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
Bruce Justin Partridge
Defendant:
State of Minnesota Beltrami County, Beltrami County, City of Bemidji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Partridge v. State of Minnesota, The et al
as 0:2022cv02104
Petitioner:
Bruce Partridge
Respondent:
State of Minnesota, The, Beltrami County, Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Protective Life Insurance Company v. Hemmingson et al
as 0:2022cv01136
Counter Defendant:
Protective Life Insurance Company
Cross Defendant:
Thomas Charles Hemmingson and Robert Kelley Hemmingson
Cross Claimant:
Janet Diane Melby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Melby v. Morgan et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dajade Elijah Melby
Defendant:
Sheriff Gabe Morgan, Sr., Sgt. T. Walker, Sgt. G. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hemmingson et al v. Melby et al
as 0:2022cv00431
Cross Defendant:
Robert Hemmingson, Thomas Hemmingson and Janet D. Melby
Cross Claimant:
Protective Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
