Cases 71 - 80 of 2,682
Laurene Meger v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv16020
Plaintiff:
Laurene Meger
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, NXJYKJYXGS, yuanrun and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Nails v. National University et al
as 2:2023cv02374
Defendant:
National University, North Central University, Unknown Party and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrey Bridges v. Patricia Blackmon, et al
as 23-3911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREY L. BRIDGES
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA BLACKMON, MARY O. BOYLE, FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Puzas v. King County et al
as 2:2023cv01656
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Puzas
Defendant:
King County, City of Bellevue, Arete Law Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHEATHAM v. WINGFIELD et al
as 5:2023cv00278
Petitioner:
MELODIE CHEATHAM
Respondent:
A W WINGFIELD and MARIANNA FDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
In re: James Esseks, et al
as 23-13524
Appellant:
In re: JAMES D. ESSEKS, CARL S. CHARLES, LATISHA GOTELL FAULKS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Melody Eagan, et alIn re: Melody Eagan, et al
as 23-13527
Appellant:
In re: MELODY H. EAGAN and JEFFREY P. DOSS
O'Dell v. Kia America, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Melody O'Dell
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
