Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Martin v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv20917
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Martin on behalf of Melvin Martin
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Melvin Martin v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 21-2700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
INSPECTOR MORGAN, LISA STOUT, Hygienist, CORRECTIONS OFFICER HOPE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Martin v. Washington et al
as 2:2019cv12119
Plaintiff:
Melvin Martin
Defendant:
Jim Knaack, Morrell, Brian Olds and others
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2018cv00654
Plaintiff:
Melvin Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martin v. USA
as 1:2016cv01571
Petitioner:
Melvin Martin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ABC Sand and Rock Company Incorporated v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2016cv01129
Plaintiff:
ABC Sand and Rock Company Incorporated
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of , Maricopa County Flood Control District , Timothy Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00133
Plaintiff:
Melvin Martin
Defendant:
The City of New York, Nelson Pabon and Emily Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABC Sand and Rock Company Inco v. County of Maricopa, et al
as 13-17542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABC SAND AND ROCK COMPANY INCORPORATED, an Arizona corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, a public entity, MARICOPA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, a political division of Maricopa County; named as Flood Control District of Maricopa County, TIMOTHY PHILLIPS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
