Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hale v. United States Public Defenders et al
as 1:2016cv00512
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
United States Public Defenders, Kunya Kenta, Joe Cecil Rhea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00474
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Tennessee Correction Academy, Treatment Correction Academy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. United States Public Defenders et al
as 1:2016cv06335
Defendant:
Daryl Blackly, Sandy Cagle, Kunya Kenta and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Lester et al
as 1:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Hale
Defendant:
Jerry Lester, Jerry Lane, Melvin Tiry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00423
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, United States of America, Melvin Tiry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. TN, State of et al
as 1:2016fp00441
Respondent:
Daryl Blackly, Sandy Cagle, FNU Petty and others
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hale v. Lester et al
as 4:2016cv01102
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Hale
Defendant:
Jerry Lester, Jerry Lane, Melvin Tiry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00658
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Darren L. Settles, State of Tennessee, Melvin Tiry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv01733
Defendant:
Doug Cook, Rob Henry, Darren L. Settles and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
