Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06313
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02585
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ad Guardians LLC v. Zamudio et al
as 1:2026cv26829
Plaintiff:
Ad Guardians LLC
Defendant:
Franco Zamudio, Dene Vincent Grunnet, Mery Z. Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rivas et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2026cv12755
Plaintiff:
Louis Abraham Rivas and Mery Patricia Rivas
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Birdow v. Mery
as 26-40450
Plaintiff:
Austin D. Birdow
Defendant:
Mark Mery, Doctor of Dental Surgery, William G. McConnell Unit and Isaac Kwarteng, Doctor, Medical Director, William G. McConnell Unit
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05062
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vega v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv06031
Plaintiff:
Mery Vega
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
