Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Carpenter v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Carpenter
Defendant:
Dept. of Corrections, Amy Jacobs, Nick Deml and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Clarke
as 7:2022cv00480
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Carpenter, Sr.
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Ponds
as 1:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Carpenter
Defendant:
A.W. Ponds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Ponds
as 1:2021cv01112
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Carpenter
Defendant:
A.W. Ponds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Caceres et al
as 3:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Michael W Carpenter, Sr.
Defendant:
Luis Taveras Caceres, Bennie Juarez, III, Sandra L Germany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00111
Respondent:
VT Dept of Corrections, Bennington District Court and Vermont Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Michael L. Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carpenter v. Winnebago County Jail
as 2:2020cv01887
Plaintiff:
Michael Evert Carpenter
Defendant:
Winnebago County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter #442122 v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2013cv00367
Plaintiff:
Michael James Carpenter #442122
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter #442122 v. MDOC et al
as 2:2013cv00147
Plaintiff:
Michael James Carpenter #442122
Defendant:
MDOC and Chippewa Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter #442122 v. Michigan Department of Corrections Time Computation Unit et al
as 1:2013cv00313
Plaintiff:
Michael James Carpenter #442122
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections Time Computation Unit, Bill Schuette, Daniel Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
