Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Nylander et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00397
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Nylander, John Merrill Adams, JR, Russell Eugene Ahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
US v. Michael Clark
as 23-6018
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEWAYNE CLARK
Clark v. USA
as 1:2022cv00216
Petitioner:
Michael Dewayne Clark
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00903
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Schifanelli v. Queen Anne's County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2020cv02906
Defendant:
Matthew Evans, Queen Anne's County, Michael R Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Gordana Schifanelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 7:2020cv00471
Plaintiff:
Arless Edwards, Jr.
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and Michael P. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. USA
as 1:2019cv00236
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Dewayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Michael Clark
as 19-4332
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEWAYNE CLARK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rubin v. Access National Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01563
Defendant:
Mary Leigh McDaniel, Janet A. Neuharth, Access National Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
