Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Freeman (PS) v. Epps et al
as 1:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Freeman, II
Defendant:
Elizabeth (I) Epps, Elizabeth Epps and Philip J. Weiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Freeman v. Wright-Freeman
as 2:2023cv13271
Defendant:
Michael Wright-Freeman, Michael Wright, Brian Rasheen Washington and others
Plaintiff:
L. Gabrielle Freeman
Ameris Bank v. Michael J. Freeman, M.D., P.A. et al
as 8:2023cv02435
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Michael J. Freeman, M.D., P.A. and Michael J. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Employment
Michael Freeman v. USA
as 22-5382
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. FREEMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christine Nordgren v. Hennepin County, et al
as 22-1902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christine M. Nordgren
Defendant / Appellee:
Hennepin County, Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department, Nystrom & Associates, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv06838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. McDonough
as 21-2152
Claimant:
MICHAEL S. FREEMAN, II
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Jones v. Freedman
as 4:2021cv10014
Defendant:
Michael Justin Freeman, Esq. and Michael Justin Freedman
Plaintiff:
Kevin Taylor Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
