Cases 1 - 10 of 134
KELLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVEN KELLY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kelly v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02655
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Kelly
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mellema v. VanOort et al
as 1:2023cv05883
Plaintiff:
Richard Mellema
Defendant:
Douglas M. VanOort, Mark W. Mallon, Kathryn B. McKenzie and others
Nominal Defendant:
NeoGenomics, Inc.
Michael Kelly v. CIR
as 23-70058
Petitioner:
MICHAEL R. KELLY
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Michael Kelly v. CIR
as 23-70040
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL R. KELLY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Kelly v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Kelly
Defendant:
State of Missouri and Judge William J Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kelly v. Oil Depot Automotor Shop et al
as 3:2022cv02215
Plaintiff:
Michael Roy Kelly
Defendant:
Oil Depot Automotor Shop and Crystal M Traylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. KELLY et al
as 5:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
WILLIE B MITCHELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL P KELLY and SECRETARY OF DEFENSE LLOYD J AUSTIN, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown et al v. United Yacht Sales, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
Brown L Ricky, Denise Cooper Karen, Ricky L. Brown and others
Defendant:
United Yacht Sales, LLC, Michael L Kelly, Marisa Velasco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
