Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Williams, Jr.In re: Michael Williams, Jr.
as 22-2704
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 22-2299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 21-2475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
MCDOWELL et al v. GREWAL et al
as 3:2020cv00433
Defendant:
CAMELIA M. VALDES, JOHN T. LENAHAN, JEFFREY H SUTHERLAND and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DOUGLAS MCDOWELL and THOMAS LEO MULLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02256
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
FRIED v. DIAS et al
as 2:2019cv19253
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER S. TERRILL, DUNCAN L. NIEDERAUER, Realogy Holdings Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM M. FRIED
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03875
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
