Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Boyle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Michael Timothy Boyle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Boyles v. Troy Bowser
as 22-35313
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE BOYLES
Respondent / Appellee:
TROY BOWSER, Warden
Boyles v. Bowser
as 2:2017cv01839
Respondent:
Troy Bowser
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Boyles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOYLES et al v. COOK MEDICAL, INC.
as 1:2016cv00784
Plaintiff:
CONNIE ARLENE BOYLES and MICHAEL DEAN BOYLES
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOYLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2015cv07027
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN BOYLE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States v. Michael Scott Boyles
as 13-3577
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Scott Boyles
Michael Boyle v. Secretary, Department of Corr, et al
as 13-13601
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL B. BOYLE
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Glas-Weld Systems, Inc. v. Boyle
as 6:2012cv02273
Defendant:
Michael P Boyle
Plaintiff:
Glas-Weld Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Encompass Teleservices, Inc. v. Randall Lee Scheets
as 2:2010mc00341
Defendant:
Randall Lee Scheets and Randy Scheets
3Rd Party Defendant:
Karol W. Kersh, Michael A. Boyle, John J. Cargal and others
Plaintiff:
Encompass Teleservices, Inc.
Encompass Teleservices Inc v. Scheets
as 2:2010mc00122
Plaintiff:
Encompass Teleservices Inc
Defendant:
Randall Lee Scheets
Thirdparty_defendant:
Savant Call Center Associates Inc, John J Cargal, Michael A Boyle and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Randy Scheets
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
