Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ramos v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00936
Defendant:
Jacob R. Peters, Michael Strickland, Kenneth E. Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ethan Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00645
Plaintiff:
Michael Ethan Ramos
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest Peachy Thomas v. The County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2019cv00167
Defendant:
The County of San Bernardino, D. Estrada, Michael A. Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Peachy Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Phillip McKenna v. Robert Lovingood et al
as 5:2018cv02258
Defendant:
Michael A. Ramos, Josie Gonzalez, Janice Rutherford and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Phillip McKenna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Junior Amador v. Mike Martinez et al
as 5:2018cv01446
Defendant:
The County of San Bernardino, Michael A. Ramos, Laura Robles and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Junior Amador
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Zamora Lopez v. Timothy A. Haskell et al
as 5:2018cv01196
Defendant:
The County of San Bernardino, Michael A. Ramos, Timothy A. Haskell and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Zamora Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Michael Ramo
as 16-50137
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN RAMOS, also known as Michael Ramos
Larry Darnell James v. Christine Spencer et al
as 5:2015cv00774
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell James
Defendant:
Bobbie Mann, Michael A Ramos and Christine Spencer
Ramos v. United States Of America
as 7:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Ramos
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
