Cases 21 - 30 of 304
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12612
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. Anderson Hospital et al
as 3:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
Alexis Mitchell
Defendant:
Anderson Hospital, Anderson Healthcare, Maryville Imagining, LLC and others
Respondent:
Andrew C. Russell, Stanley J. Sidwell and Mark S. Fedder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Medical Care Recovery
Steven Staub v. Tracy Nietzel, et al
as 22-5384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN STAUB
Defendant / Appellee:
TRACY NIETZEL, MARCUS FAULKNER, JONATHAN BEASLEY and others
Wilson v. State of Nevada
as 2:2022cv00978
Petitioner:
Michael W. Wilson
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Fentress et al
as 4:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Wilson
Defendant:
Nicki Fentress, Cassie Thompson, Tamberly McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
WILSON v. AMES et al
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYQUAYNE WILSON
Defendant:
LT. AMES, DEPUTY/WARDEN HOLMAN, WARDEN KEVIN SUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. PERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00457
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID WILSON, JR
Defendant:
WARDEN CLINTON PERRY, JESSICA DEAN, LACHAKA MCKENZIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain et al v. Rushing et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Medgine Sarah Jean
Defendant:
Karen E. Rushing, Todd Newton, Jeffrey R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wilson v. Stenger & Stenger PC
as 3:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wilson
Defendant:
Stenger & Stenger PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Elkhart County Circuit Court
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wilson
Defendant:
Elkhart County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
