Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Michael Taylor v. US
as 23-6129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, In its official capacity, US DISTRICT COURT RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA, In its official capacity and others
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022ct03126
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, U.S. District Court Raleigh, NC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals et al
as 5:2022ct03117
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
4th Circuit Court of Appeals, Stubbs Perdue, Attorneys at Law, Christopher Venters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
USA v. Michael Taylor
as 22-11090
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TAYLOR
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, U.S. District Court, Raleigh, NC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Taylor v. Stubbs Perdue Attorneys at Law
as 19-19785
Defendant / Appellee:
STUBBS PERDUE, ATTORNEYS AT LAW and CHRISTOPHER BRYAN VENTERS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TAYLOR
Larry Flynt v. George Lombardi, et al
as 16-2232
Intervenor - Appellant:
Larry C. Flynt
Plaintiff:
Earl Ringo, John C. Middleton, Russell Bucklew and others
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, Terry Russell and John Doe
Michael Taylor v. National Security Agency
as 16-6288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Larry Flynt v. George Lombardi, et al
as 16-1295
Intervenor - Appellant:
Larry C. Flynt
Plaintiff:
Earl Ringo, John C. Middleton, Russell Bucklew and others
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, Terry Russell and John Doe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
