Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Quartman v. Hayes et al
as 2:2020cv01476
Defendant:
Brian Hayes, Department of Corrections Division of Hearings and Appeals, Michael Barth and others
Plaintiff:
Qianne Latrice Quartman and Qianna Latrice Quartman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05879
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARTH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv58527
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freestone v. Barth et al
as 2:2020cv00185
Defendant:
Michael Barth and Terri Clarke
Plaintiff:
Collin Burke Freestone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James L. Kirk v. Terry Rose, et al
as 17-1583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. KIRK
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY ROSE, DIANE CASPARI, AILEEN HENRY and others
Kirk v. Bonneson et al
as 2:2016cv01390
Plaintiff:
James L Kirk
Defendant:
Paul Bonneson, Michael Barth, Diane Caspari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Barth, et al v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, et al
as 16-3593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BARTH and MAUREEN BARTH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HUSBAND AND WIFE
Defendant - Appellee:
WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS US INC and WALT DISNEY CO
Kirk v. Rose et al
as 2:2016cv00799
Plaintiff:
James L Kirk
Defendant:
Terry Rose, Diane Caspari, Aileen Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARTH, et al. v. THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, et al
as 2:2016cv02140
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARTH and MAUREEN BARTH
Defendant:
THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY and WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pence et al v. Arizona Superior Court et al
as 2:2015cv01481
Plaintiff:
Michael J Pence and Tauni R Pence
Defendant:
Arizona Superior Court, Benjamin E Vatz, James Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
