Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rogers v. Benedict et al
as 5:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Megan Rogers
Defendant:
Michael Benedict, Rudolph Sohl, Sara Sohl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benedict v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv00245
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Michael Benedict
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RINAUDO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71620
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BENEDICT RINAUDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benedict v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01516
Plaintiff:
Michael Benedict
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Turpin et al v. Autonation, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv02867
Plaintiff:
William Turpin , Jesus Flores , Paul Edwards and others
Defendant:
Autonation, Inc. , AN San Jose Luxury Imports, Inc. , Autonation Mercedes-Benz of Stevens Creek and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Benedict et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32530
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Benedict and Michael Benedict
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benedict v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00512
Plaintiff:
Michael Benedict
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Peoples et al v. Expert Sales & Service Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv14389
Plaintiff:
Micah Peoples, Micah Peoples, Christopher Graham and others
Defendant:
Expert Sales & Service Corporation, Michael Hubbard and Michael Benedict
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Apace Communications, Ltd. et al v. Burke et al
as 6:2007cv06151
Plaintiff:
Apace Communications, Ltd., Apace Communications, Ltd., Rakesh Aggarwal and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Burke, Jeffrey Burke, David Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
