Cases 31 - 40 of 169
Brooks et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01643
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS and LATASHA BROOKS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROOKS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv05475
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BROOKS
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67328
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51938
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goodman v. Brooks et al
as 1:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
Mr. Lynwood A Goodman
Defendant:
Beth Cabell, Michael Brooks and D Raines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Brooks
as 1:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
William Robert Banks
Defendant:
Michael Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barraza v. Liberty Utilities Co.
as 2:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Joel Erickson, Brianna Morris and others
Defendant:
Liberty Utilities Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02953
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MICHAEL BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Integon General Insurance Corporation v. Boyd et al
as 1:2020cv02811
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency, THOMAS LEE, LA VERNE N BOYD and others
Plaintiff:
INTEGON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Integon General Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
