Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carroll v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Carroll and Mike A. Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wiedemann et al v. Carroll et al
as 2:2019cv10781
Plaintiff:
Joyce Wiedemann, Gwendolyn Avery and K. A.
Defendant:
T. Williams, City of Detroit, Michael Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devonshire REIT II, Inc. v. Carroll et al
as 3:2019cv00369
Defendant:
John B Roche and Michael Carroll
Plaintiff:
Devonshire REIT II LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Carroll v. Jeffrey Wood
as 16-2581
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden
Overbay v. McDonald's Corporation et al (TV3)
as 2:2016cv00337
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, John Ray Israel, Israel Enterprises and others
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Elaine Overbay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joseph Zickes v. Cuyahoga County, et al
as 16-4180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ZICKES
Defendant - Appellee:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, CUYAHOGA COUNTY EXECUTIVE, BRYAN SMITH and others
Zickes v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2015cv01865
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County , Cuyahoga County Executive , Bryan Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zickes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheffler v. Lee et al
as 3:2014cv00373
Plaintiff:
Troy K. Scheffler
Defendant:
Alex Lee, Michael Carroll, Frederick Asset Protection LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Oakland County Sheriff et al
as 2:2013cv15281
Plaintiff:
Michael Carroll
Defendant:
Oakland County Sheriff, Oakland County Police Department, Auburn Hills Police Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
