Cases 1 - 10 of 23
TELETRAC NAVMAN US LTD. v. ELEMENT NETWRX, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
Teletrac Navman US Ltd.
Defendant:
ELEMENT NETWRX, LLC and PHILIP MICHAEL CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butts v. Beye et al
as 1:2019cv00376
Defendant:
George E. Schaefer, Junius P. Fulton, III, Norfolk Circuit Court and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Butts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell et al v. Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01057
Defendant:
Koons Chevrolet, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Honeywell International Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Bell and Brenda L. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00579
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
The Travelers Indemnity Company v. Michael C. Haiden Company et al
as 8:2017cv00372
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Michael C. Haiden Company, Michael Charles Haiden and Firestone Building Products Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Everingham
as 1:2015cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Freeman
Defendant:
Melvin Ronald Everingham, II
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Michael McGee v. Harold Clarke
as 14-7778
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHARLES MCGEE
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
McGee v. Clarke
as 1:2014cv00757
Petitioner:
Michael Charles McGee
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowley et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2013cv02245
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Rowley and Debora J. Rowley
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
