Cases 31 - 40 of 398
Perry v. Lumpkin
as 22-40309
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Dean Perry
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ross v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00817
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Ross
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MyPort, Inc. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
as 2:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
MyPort, Inc.
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
Michael Dean Paul
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LATTUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04466
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DEAN LATTUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03908
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN MICHAEL DEAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
G+ Communications, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. LTD., et al
as 2:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
G+ Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co. LTD., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Michael Dean Paul
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gonzales v. Dryden et al
as 7:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Dean Gonzales
Defendant:
Attorney Pro Tem Woodson Erich Dryden, Chief of Police Michael Gerke, Director Steven C. McCraw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
