Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Michael Oko v. City of Cleveland, OH, et al
as 23-3903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. OKO
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH, OFFICER JOHN SMITH, originally named as Officer John Doe, OFFICER JOHN COMBS and others
Michael Oko v. City of Cleveland, OH, et al
as 23-3880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. OKO
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH, OFFICER JOHN SMITH, originally named as Officer John Doe, OFFICER JOHN COMBS and others
Oko v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2021cv02222
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Oko
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Officer John Doe, Officer John Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DONEGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv02215
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DONEGAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donegan v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv17593
Plaintiff:
Michael Donegan
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCray et al v. New York State et al
as 1:2013cv04766
Plaintiff:
Cerious McCray and Kimberly Casanova
Defendant:
New York State, State Commission of Correction (SCOC), Thomas A. Beilein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Donegan v. CHFS Holdings, Inc., et al
as 11-56353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DONEGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHFS HOLDINGS, INC., DBA Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital and YARNELL BAYLISS, M.D.
Michael Donegan v. CHFS Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv05444
Defendant:
Dr. Yarnell Bayliss and CHFS Holdings Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Donegan
Michael Donegan v. CHFS Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01828
Defendant:
Dr. Yarnell Bayliss, CHFS Holdings Inc. and Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital
Plaintiff:
Michael Donegan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
