Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wordlaw v. Echols et al
as 1:2022cv01951
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Wordlaw
Defendant:
Michael Echols, John Doe, Family Dollar Stores of Georgia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
4 Aces Enterprises LLC, et al v. John Bel Edwards, et al
as 2:2020cv02150
Plaintiff:
Marlee Celine, LLC d/b/a Murphy's, 4 Aces Enterprises LLC d/b/a 4 Aces Lounge, Dat Bar, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
John Bel Edwards, Fire Marshal H Butch Browning, Jr., H Browning, Jr and others
Amicus Curiae:
Dodie Horton, Phillip Tarver, Bob Hensgens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Michael Echols v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv09203
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Echols
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Spakes et al v. National Strategic Protective Services, LLC (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00365
Plaintiff:
Tommy Spakes , Alvin Arnwine , Daniel Barnes and others
Defendant:
National Strategic Protective Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Spakes et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Tommy Spakes , Alvin Arnwine , Daniel Barnes and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
