Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Michael DayIn re: Michael Day
as 23-2323
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL FRANCISCO DAY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Francisco v. City Market, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03280
Plaintiff:
Michael Francisco
Defendant:
City Market, Inc., Kroger Company, The and Tia Walker
Francisco v. Abengoa, S.A.
as 22-2438
Plaintiff:
Michael Francisco, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and Daniel LaMoureaux, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jesse Sherman and Arlette Sherman
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAMCAH-UA Local 675 Pension Fund
Defendant / Appellee:
Abengoa, S.A., Manuel Sanchez Ortega, Canaccord Genuity Inc. and others
Defendant:
Santiago Seage, Barbara Zubiria, Ignacio Garcia Alvear and others
Francisco v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv00968
Plaintiff:
Michael Francisco
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
FRANCISCO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52017
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FRANCISCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Francisco v. City of Redmond et al
as 6:2020cv00096
Defendant:
Timothy Warburg, Hannah Copeland and City of Redmond
Plaintiff:
michael francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Michael Day
as 19-1710
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL FRANCISCO DAY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
FRANCISCO et al v. HILTI, INC.
as 2:2018cv03269
Defendant:
HILTI, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA FRANCISCO and MICHAEL FRANCISCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Francisco v. Abengoa, S.A. et al
as 1:2015cv06279
Plaintiff:
Michael Francisco
Defendant:
Abengoa, S.A. , Santiago Seage, Manuel Sanchez Ortega and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Parks v. Francisco
as 5:2015cv05057
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Parks
Defendant:
Michael Francisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
