Cases 41 - 50 of 87
McCaw v. Diaz et al
as 1:2016cv03186
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrett McCaw
Defendant:
Luis Diaz and Susan McPartland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCaw v. Fox et al
as 3:2016cv02288
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrett McCaw
Defendant:
Maureen L. Fox and County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCaw v. Diaz et al
as 2:2016cv01861
Defendant:
Luis Diaz and Susan McPartland
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrett McCaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Garrett v. William Stephens, et al
as 16-40354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, CANDACE MOORE and KEN PAXTON
Garrett v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00143
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ephrain v. Gossett et al
as 3:2015cv03359
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Ephrain
Defendant:
Greg Gossett, Zach Roeckeman, Rick Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Parker et al
as 1:2015cv06951
Defendant:
Estate of Robert H. Parker, John Doe Insurance Co., John Doe, Esq. Insurance Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JOHNSON v. HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2015cv00419
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY R JOHNSON
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA , WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA , JOHNNY C SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Stephens et al
as 2:2015cv00403
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrett
Defendant:
William Stephens and Candace Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Garrett v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10802
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL GARRETT
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
